The Republican Party has the support of the American people in repealing Obamacare.  The newly elected Congress should target Obamacare in January 2011.

During the 2010 election, Obamacare quickly emerged as the first major issue of the congressional races.  The American public does not want Obamacare, especially the way it was forced on the tax payers.  The president (a socialist) says tweak it. We say scrap it and write a real health care bill that will benefit Americans and reduce medical costs.

A USA Today-Gallup survey on the public's priorities for the new Congress listed "repealing health care law" one point behind cutting federal spending. In a Reuters-Ipsos poll on issues for Congress in 2011, 53 percent listed health care reform as "crucial" and 41 percent said it was "important." A pre-election Pew Research Center survey showed health care as the second-most-important issue to voters after the job situation. And a CBS News exit poll showed that 48 percent of those who voted said Obamacare should be repealed and just 16 percent thought it should be left alone.

President Obama and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid both said the law could be "tweaked," but they oppose any extensive reconstructive surgery.  Mr. Obama oddly said he did not want to "relitigate" the issue, though the legal challenges to the law are just beginning.  Future judicial rulings may eviscerate Obamacare and force the matter back to the legislature, but the new Congress should not wait for the courts to take action.  Repeal it now.

The most odious aspects of Obamacare are yet to hit. The law was crafted so that the harsh provisions would kick in after the election, a failed attempt to insulate Democrats from voter backlash. Obamacare is not only bad law, it is the symbol of a broken system.

The legislation was slapped together hurriedly and without adequate staff - or lawmaker - review. It became a grab bag of regulations and loopholes favoring Democratic-leaning special interests. Republicans were unceremoniously shut out of the entire legislative process. The bill was forced through the Congress in a riot of arm-twisting and secretive backroom deals.

Few if any members of Congress read the bill before they voted on it. The American people were denied the transparency and open process Mr. Obama had promised during his campaign. Obamacare was the poster child for everything wrong with the contemporary legislative process. It is the result of very liberal and socialist ideas from the far left Democrat party..

Some of the critical issues of Obamacare that people do not like are below:

*The law does provide for rationing of health care
*The law does provide for free health care for illegal immigrants
*The law does provide for free abortion services
*The law does eventually force private insurance companies out of business
*The law does force everyone into a government run system
*The law does force all medical decisions to be made by federal bureaucrats, not doctors
*The law does restrict payments to physicians
*The law does restrict medical devices that be controlled by the government
*The law does create 20,000 new government workers to handle all of these decisions (for you)
*The law does restrict any other affordable health care choices
*The law does create many new taxes in order to pay for this massive take over by government
*The law does force you to either accept the federal plan or pay a fine (tax) if you do not have medical insurance
 
The Congress and the Executive Branch has no authority to regulate health care.  The Constitution does not give then the power to regulate and force people into a government health care system.  Individual personal data and financial information will be given to the federal regulator to manage your physician, medical options, and your hospital stays.  Everyone's right to privacy will now be managed by a government employee. 

Are you ready for Obamacare?  Do you want the Republicans to repeal this law?  Voters in MD, CA, WA, and other liberal Democrat states seem like they want more government control.  Go figure....

From the campaign trail to the White House, Obama has been after "our money" to push all of his socialist ideas and policies.  He has used our money to fund bailouts of banks, private companies, unions, organizations helping illegal immigrants, and big government.  There is a new film that you must see that reveals his plan.

Taking aim at the Obama administrations economic record, a new documentary is looking to ride a wave of government resentment to the unusual heights of blockbuster status.

The makers of "I Want Your Money," which uses animation plus interviews with conservative-leaning pundits, know their core audience--the American taxpayer.  They have tapped one of the few marketing companies with experience in attracting conservative-leaning voters to movies. Motive Entertainment worked on "The Passion of the Christ" and "Expelled," films that exceeded box office expectations.

"Its all about connecting with the core motivation and value of the taxpayers who value our Constitution," said Paul Lauer, CEO and founder of Motive Entertainment. For "The Passion of the Christ," that meant reaching out to faith-based groups. "I Want Your Money" is seeking out other targets - conservative talk-show hosts and "tea party" affiliates.

The YouTube trailer for the film, which opens Oct. 15, has been viewed more than 2.5 million times.  The movie's stinging rebuke of President Obama's stewardship of the nation's foundering economy has another arrow in its marketing quiver - the film's narrator and driving force, director Ray Griggs.

The documentary will succeed or fail based on its entertainment value, not partisan finger-pointing, said Eddie Schmidt, president of the International Documentary Association and an Academy Award-nominated documentary filmmaker ("Twist of Faith" and "This Film Is Not Yet Rated").

Documentary films rarely take in more than a few million dollars at the box office and sometimes fail to make a fraction of that amount. "Fahrenheit 9/11" made $119 million during its 2004 theatrical run, a figure more akin to a superhero sequel than a cinematic commentary.  However, the media and even schools hyped the film so many people went to the movies to see it and we now know that much of the film was a "lie".

Since this film is not dependent upon the media, it will be successful with the average American citizen who is worried about Obama's socialism and the disdain that he has for American values, self-reliance, fewer taxes, and less government.  We all need to see this film.  Also, vote in November...kick the bums out.

Well, someone figured out why Obama nominated Elana Kagan for the Supreme Court....

Pull up the Supreme Courts website, go to the docket and search for Obama. Kagan was the Solicitor General for all the suits against him filed with the Supreme Court to show proof of natural born citizenship. He owed her big time. All of the requests were denied of course. They were never heard. It just keeps getting deeper and deeper, doesn't it? The American people mean nothing any longer. It's all about payback time for those that compromised themselves to elect someone that really has no true right to even be there. We should be getting so sick of all of this nonsense.

Also, recently, a military judge ruled that the evidence of Obama's eligibility to hold office could be an embarrassment to the President and therefore will not be allowed in her court.  This is in response that a LTC said that he would not follow Obama's orders as President since he was not born in the US and not legally holding the office.

Court Case

No. 09-8857   
Title:    
Jerome Julius Brown, Sr., Petitioner
v.
Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al.
Docketed:    January 29, 2010
Lower Ct:    United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
  Case Nos.:    (09-5103)
  Decision Date:    October 28, 2009

~~~Date~~~     ~~~~~~~Proceedings  and  Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nov 18 2009     Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 1, 2010)
Feb 16 2010     Waiver of right of respondents Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al. to respond filed.
Mar 11 2010     DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 26, 2010.
Mar 29 2010     Petition DENIED.


~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~        ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~       ~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioner:
       
Jerome Julius Brown Sr.    7209 Robin Hood Drive # 3093    (301) 357-9336
    Upper Marlboro, MD  20773   
Party name: Jerome Julius Brown, Sr.
Attorneys for Respondents:
       
Elena Kagan    Solicitor General    (202) 514-2217

    Counsel of Record    United States Department of Justice    
    950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.   
    Washington, DC  20530-0001   
    SupremeCtBriefs@USDOJ.gov

Party name: Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al.

Obama Politics is about Pay for Play and lying to the American people....

Read my lips---noone making less than $250,000 will pay more taxes.  The below new taxes will tax every American citizen.  Is it the "No Tax Obama Plan"?

In just six months, the largest tax hikes in the history of America will  take effect.  They will hit families and small businesses in three great  waves on January 1, 2011:

First Wave: Expiration of 2001 and 2003 Tax Relief

In 2001 and 2003, the GOP Congress enacted several tax cuts for investors,  small business owners, and families.   These will all expire on January 1, 2011:

Personal income tax rates will rise.  The top income tax rate will rise from 35 to 39.6 percent (this is also the rate at which two-thirds of small business profits are taxed).  The lowest rate will rise from 10 to 15 percent.  All the rates in between will also rise.  Itemized deductions and personal exemptions will again phase out, which has the same mathematical effect as higher marginal tax rates.  The full list of marginal rate hikes is below:

 - The 10% bracket rises to an expanded 15%
 - The 25% bracket rises to 28%
 - The 28% bracket rises to 31%
 - The 33% bracket rises to 36%
 - The 35% bracket rises to 39.6%

Higher taxes on marriage and family.  The "marriage penalty" (narrower tax brackets for married couples) will return from the first dollar of  income.  The child tax credit will be cut in half from $1000 to $500 per  child.  The standard deduction will no longer be doubled for married couples relative to the single level.  The dependent care and adoption tax credits will be cut.

The return of the Death Tax.  This year, there is no death tax.  For those dying on or after January 1 2011, there is a 55 percent top death tax rate on estates over $1 million.  A person leaving behind two homes and a retirement account could easily pass along a death tax bill to their loved ones.

Higher tax rates on savers and investors.  The capital gains tax will rise  from 15 percent this year to 20 percent in 2011.  The dividends tax will  rise from 15 percent this year to 39.6 percent in 2011.  These rates will  rise another 3.8 percent in 2013.

Second Wave: Obamacare

There are over twenty new or higher taxes in Obamacare.  Several will first go into effect on January 1, 2011.  Now senior citizens are at riak of losing their AARP health plans.  They include:

The "Medicine Cabinet Tax"  Thanks to Obamacare, Americans will no longer be able to use health savings account (HSA), flexible spending account (FSA), or health reimbursement (HRA) pre-tax dollars to purchase non-prescription, over-the-counter medicines (except insulin).

The "Special Needs Kids Tax"  This provision of Obamacare imposes a cap on flexible spending accounts (FSAs) of $2500 (Currently, there is no federal government limit).  There is one group of FSA owners for whom this new cap will be particularly cruel and onerous: parents of special needs children. There are thousands of families with special needs children in the United States, and many of them use FSAs to pay for special needs education. Tuition rates at one leading school that teaches special needs children in Washington, D.C. (National Child Research Center) can easily exceed $14,000 per year.  Under tax rules, FSA dollars can be used to pay for this type of special needs education.

The HSA Withdrawal Tax Hike.  This provision of Obamacare increases the additional tax on non-medical early withdrawals from an HSA from 10 to 20 percent, disadvantaging them relative to IRAs and other tax-advantaged accounts, which remain at 10 percent.

All real estate transactions will be taxed at a 3.5% rate to help pay for health care and seniors will have to terminate their current AARP plans.

Third Wave: The Alternative Minimum Tax and Employer Tax Hikes

When Americans prepare to file their tax returns in January of 2011, they'll be in for a nasty surprise-the AMT won't be held harmless, and many tax relief provisions will have expired.  The major items include:

The AMT will ensnare over 28 million families, up from 4 million last year. According to the left-leaning Tax Policy Center, Congress' failure to index the AMT will lead to an explosion of AMT taxpaying families-rising from 4 million last year to 28.5 million.  These families will have to calculate their tax burdens twice, and pay taxes at the higher level.  The AMT was created in 1969 to ensnare a handful of taxpayers.

Small business expensing will be slashed and 50% expensing will disappear. Small businesses can normally expense (rather than slowly-deduct, or "depreciate") equipment purchases up to $250,000.  This will be cut all the way down to $25,000.  Larger businesses can expense half of their purchases of equipment.  In January of 2011, all of it will have to be "depreciated."

Taxes will be raised on all types of businesses.  There are literally scores of tax hikes on business that will take place.  The biggest is the loss of the "research and experimentation tax credit," but there are many, many others.  Combining high marginal tax rates with the loss of this tax relief will cost jobs.

Tax Benefits for Education and Teaching Reduced.  The deduction for tuition and fees will not be available.  Tax credits for education will be limited. Teachers will no longer be able to deduct classroom expenses.  Coverdell Education Savings Accounts will be cut.  Employer-provided educational assistance is curtailed.  The student loan interest deduction will be disallowed for hundreds of thousands of families.

Charitable Contributions from IRAs no longer allowed.  Under current law, a retired person with an IRA can contribute up to $100,000 per year directly to a charity from their IRA.  This contribution also counts toward an annual "required minimum distribution."  This ability will no longer be there. 

The government wants to stop individual donations so the government can do it all and provide everything to everyone.  Obama and the liberal left want the government to run every aspect of our lives.  This gives the former President Bush's statement about taxes (Read My Lips)----a whole new meaning.

From The London Daily Telegraph Editor On Foreign Relations
 
"Let me be clear: I'm not normally in favour of boycotts, and I love the American people. I holiday in their country regularly, and hate the tedious snobby sneers against the United States. But the American people chose to elect an idiot who seems hell bent on insulting their allies, and something must be done to stop Obama's reckless foreign policy, before he does the dirty on his allies on every issue."
One of the most poorly kept secrets in Washington is President Obama's animosity toward Great Britain, presumably because of what he regards as its sins while ruling Kenya (1895-1963).

One of Barack Hussein Obama's first acts as president was to return to Britain a bust of Winston Churchill that had graced the Oval Office since 9/11.  He followed this up by denying Prime Minister Gordon Brown, on his first state visit, the usual joint press conference with flags.

The president was "too tired" to grant the leader of America's closest ally a proper welcome, his aides told British journalists.

Mr. Obama followed this up with cheesy gifts for Mr. Brown and the Queen. Columnist Ian Martin described his behavior as "rudeness personified." There was more rudeness in store for Mr. Brown at the opening session of the United Nations in September. "The prime minister was forced to dash through the kitchens of the UN in New York to secure five minutes of face time with President Obama after five requests for a sit down meeting were rejected by the White House," said London Telegraph columnist David Hughes.  Mr. Obama's "churlishness is unforgivable," Mr. Hughes said.

The administration went beyond snubs and slights last week when Secretary of State Hillary Clinton endorsed the demand of Argentine President Cristina Kirchner, a Hugo Chavez ally, for mediation of Argentina's specious claim to the Falkland Islands, a British dependency since 1833. The people who live in the Falklands, who speak English, want nothing to do with Argentina. When, in 1982, an earlier Argentine dictatorship tried to seize the Falklands by force, the British -- with strong support from President Ronald Reagan -- expelled them.

"It is truly shocking that Barack Obama has decided to disregard our shared history," wrote Telegraph columnist Toby Young. "Does Britain's friendship really mean so little to him?" One could ask, does the friendship of anyone in the entire world mean anything to him?

"I recently asked several senior administration officials, separately, to name a foreign leader with whom Barack Obama has forged a strong personal relationship during his first year in office," wrote Jackson Diehl, deputy editorial page editor of the Washington Post, on Monday. "A lot of hemming and hawing ensued." One official named French President Nicolas Sarkozy, but his contempt for Mr. Obama is an open secret. Another named German Chancellor Angela Merkel. But, said Mr. Diehl, "Merkel too has been conspicuously cool toward Obama."

Mr. Obama certainly doesn't care about the Poles and Czechs, whom he has betrayed on missile defense. Honduras and Israel also can attest that he's been an unreliable ally and an unfaithful friend.  Ironically, our relations with both Israel and the Palestinian Authority have never been worse. Russia has offered nothing in exchange for Mr. Obama's abandonment of missile defense. Russia and China won't support serious sanctions on Iran. Syria's support for terrorism has not diminished despite efforts to normalize diplomatic relations. The reclusive military dictatorship that runs Burma has responded to our efforts at "engagement" by deepening its ties to North Korea.

And the Chinese make little effort to disguise their contempt for him.  With his support of the mosque in NYC, Obama has lost the goodwill of New Yorkers and the families of the dead from 9-11.

For the first time in a long time, the President of the United States is actually distrusted by its allies and not in the least feared by its adversaries. Nor is Mr. Obama now respected by the majority of Americans.

Understandably focused on the dismal economy and Mr. Obama's relentless efforts to nationalize and socialize health care, Americans apparently have yet to notice his dismal performance and lack of respect in the world community.  They soon will.  We told you who Obama is, but you would not listen....

Below are the reasons to vote Against Obama and the Democrats and even liberal Republicans....

The American people elected an inexperienced and liberal socialist as President and now are realizing just how bad he is as a NON-leader for the American people.  Can it get any worse for President Obama? Undoubtedly yes. Here are 10 key reasons why the Obama presidency is in serious trouble, and why its prospects are unlikely to improve between now and the November mid-terms.

We must vote in November to remove the liberals from Congress and start a "RE-DO" of all of the new policies and laws instituted by Obama and his liberal left friends.

1. The Obama presidency is out of touch with the American people

In a previous post I noted how the Obama presidency increasingly resembles a modern-day Ancien Régime, extravagant, decaying and out of touch with ordinary Americans. The First Lady’s ill-conceived trip to Spain at a time of widespread economic hardship was symbolic of a White House that barely gives a second thought to public opinion on many issues, and frequently projects a distinctly elitist image. The “let them eat cake” approach didn’t play well over two centuries ago, and it won’t succeed today.

2. Most Americans don’t have confidence in the president’s leadership

This deficit of trust in Obama’s leadership is central to his decline. According to a recent Washington Post/ABC News poll, “nearly six in ten voters say they lack faith in the president to make the right decisions for the country”, and two thirds “say they are disillusioned with or angry about the way the federal government is working.” The poll showed that a staggering 58 per cent of Americans say they do not have confidence in the president’s decision-making, with just 42 per cent saying they do.

3. Obama fails to inspire

In contrast to the soaring rhetoric of his 2006 Convention speech in Chicago which succeeded in impressing millions of television viewers at the time, America is no longer inspired by Barack Obama’s flat, monotonous and often dull presidential speeches and statements delivered via teleprompter. From his extraordinarily uninspiring Afghanistan speech at West Point to his flat State of the Union address, President Obama has failed to touch the heart of America . Even Jimmy Carter was more moving.

4. The United States is drowning in debt

The Congressional Budget Office Long-Term Budget Outlook offers a frightening picture of the scale of America ’s national debt. Under its alternative fiscal scenario, the CBO projects that US debt could rise to 87 percent of GDP by 2020, 109 percent by 2025, and 185 percent in 2035. While much of Europe, led by Britain and Germany , are aggressively cutting their deficits, the Obama administration is actively growing America ’s debt, and has no plan in place to avert a looming Greek-style financial crisis.

5. Obama’s Big Government message is falling flat

The relentless emphasis on bailouts and stimulus spending has done little to spur economic growth or create jobs, but has greatly advanced the power of the federal government in America . This is not an approach that is proving popular with the American public, and even most European governments have long ditched this tax and spend approach to saving their own economies.

6. Obama’s support for socialized health care is a huge political mistake

In an extraordinary act of political Harakiri, President Obama leant his full support to the hugely controversial, unpopular and divisive health care reform bill, with a monstrous price tag of $940 billion, whose repeal is now supported by 55 per cent of likely US voters. As I wrote at the time of its passing, the legislation is “a great leap forward by the United States towards a European-style vision of universal health care, which will only lead to soaring costs, higher taxes, and a surge in red tape for small businesses. This reckless legislation dramatically expands the power of the state over the lives of individuals, and could not be further from the vision of America ’s founding fathers.”

7. Obama’s handling of the Gulf oil spill has been weak-kneed and indecisive

While much of the spilled oil in the Gulf has now been thankfully cleared up, the political damage for the White House will be long-lasting. Instead of showing real leadership on the matter by acing decisively and drawing upon offers of international support, the Obama administration settled on a more convenient strategy of relentlessly bashing an Anglo-American company while largely sitting on its hands. Significantly, a poll of Louisiana voters gave George W. Bush higher marks for his handling of the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, with 62 percent disapproving of Obama’s performance on the Gulf oil spill.

8. US foreign policy is an embarrassing mess under the Obama administration

It is hard to think of a single foreign policy success for the Obama administration, but there have been plenty of missteps which have weakened American global power as well as the standing of the United States . The surrender to Moscow on Third Site missile defence, the failure to aggressively stand up to Iran’s nuclear programme, the decision to side with ousted Marxists in Honduras, the slap in the face for Great Britain over the Falklands, have all contributed to the image of a US administration completely out of its depth in international affairs. The Obama administration’s high risk strategy of appeasing America ’s enemies while kicking traditional US allies has only succeeded in weakening the United States while strengthening her adversaries.

9. President Obama is muddled and confused on national security

From the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq to the War on Terror, President Obama’s leadership has often been muddled and confused. On Afghanistan he rightly sent tens of thousands of additional troops to the battlefield. At the same time however he bizarrely announced a timetable for the withdrawal of US forces beginning in July 2011, handing the initiative to the Taliban. On Iraq he has announced an end to combat operations and the withdrawal of all but 50,000 troops despite a recent upsurge in terrorist violence and political instability, and without the Iraqi military and police ready to take over. In addition he has ditched the concept of a War on Terror, replacing it with an Overseas Contingency Operation, hardly the right message to send in the midst of a long-war against Al-Qaeda.

10. Obama doesn’t believe in American greatness

Barack Obama has made it clear that he doesn’t believe in American exceptionalism, and has made apologising for his country into an art form. In a speech to the United Nations last September he stated that “no one nation can or should try to dominate another nation. No world order that elevates one nation or group of people over another will succeed. No balance of power among nations will hold.” It is difficult to see how a US president who holds these views and does not even accept America ’s greatness in history can actually lead the world’s only superpower with force and conviction.

There is a distinctly Titanic-like feel to the Obama presidency and it’s not hard to see why. The most left-wing president in modern American history has tried to force a highly interventionist, government-driven agenda that runs counter to the principles of free enterprise, individual freedom, and limited government that have made the United States the greatest power in the world, and the freest nation on earth.

This, combined with weak leadership both at home and abroad against the backdrop of tremendous economic uncertainty in an increasingly dangerous world, has contributed to a spectacular political collapse for a president once thought to be invincible. America at its core remains a deeply conservative nation, which cherishes its traditions and founding principles. President Obama is increasingly out of step with the American people, by advancing policies that undermine the United States as a global power, while undercutting America ’s deep-seated love for freedom.

The White House's official policy of banning the word "Islam" in describing America's terrorist enemies is in direct conflict with the U.S. military's war-fighting doctrine now guiding commanders in Iraq and Afghanistan.  General Petraeus is a talented military leader, but now he has to walk the fine line of winning a war and cow-towing to the liberal left Obama administration.  The American people want the US to kill the Islamic terrorist, stablize the Afghan government, and come home as "winning the war".

John O. Brennan, President Obama's chief national security adviser for counterterrorism, delivered a major policy address on defining the enemy. He laid out the White House policy of detaching any reference to Islam when referring to terrorists, be it al Qaeda, the Taliban or any other group.  However, Army Gen. David H. Petraeus led the production of an extensive counterinsurgency manual in December 2006 that does, in fact, tell commanders of a link between Islam and extremists.

The Petraeus doctrine refers to "Islamic insurgents," "Islamic extremists" and "Islamic subversives." It details ties between Muslim support groups and terrorists. His co-author was Gen. James F. Amos, whom Mr. Obama has picked as the next Marine Corps commandant and Joint Chiefs of Staff member.  Currently, the Obama administration is telling the military that they have to call the Islamic terrorists----thugs.  Yes, they are now thugs, just like thugs in American cities.

Mr. Brennan on May 26 told an audience at the Center for Strategic and International Studies that "describing our enemy in religious terms would lend credence to the lie propagated by al Qaeda and its affiliates to justify terrorism, that the United States is somehow at war against Islam. The reality, of course, is that we have never been and will never be at war with Islam. After all, Islam, like so many faiths, is part of America."

In a speech that also severed the Obama administration from President George W. Bush's "war on terror," Mr. Brennan also said: "The president's strategy is absolutely clear about the threat we face. Our enemy is not terrorism because terrorism is but a tactic. Our enemy is not terror because terror is a state of mind and, as Americans, we refuse to live in fear. Nor do we describe our enemy as jihadists or Islamists because jihad is holy struggle, a legitimate tenet of Islam meaning to purify oneself of one's community."

Asked about the discrepancy between the White House policy and the military's counterinsurgency doctrine, Michael Hammer, Mr. Brennan's spokesman, said "We don't have anything to add to John's speech."  Larry Korb, a military analyst at the Center for American Progress, said Mr. Brennan is correct to avoid linking Islam to terrorism.  "Once you attach a religious thing, you're basically saying somehow or other this is caused by the religion," Mr. Korb said. "Most Muslims are not that way."

He added, "If you put that term [Islamic terrorist] on there, it causes you more problems in the long run. You don't want to see this as a war on quote unquote the Muslim world. If I took a look at all the people, for example, who killed abortion doctors and I said they're Christian terrorists, or something like that, and they are all who have done that. That is their interpretation of the Bible. But most people are not. Some of these people will quote the Bible and say I had to go after this doctor because he's killing innocents."

This administration is putting American lives at risk by this insane policy and bowing to the Islamic terrorists.  Who's side is the administration on?  Just like supporting the illegal immigrants and drug runners coming across our southern border, the administration is targeting the citizens of Arizona--not the criminals or terrorists who are coming across our border.

Why is Obama promising more aid in the amount of $400 M to Gaza?  The people in Gaza hate the US and Hamas is targeting our security partner-Israel.  What is wrong with our foreign policy and our fiscal policies.  Why do we as US tax payers fund these types of worldwide pet projects?  Why are we spending billions of dollars on AIDS in Africa?  Where are the funds from other countries?

Why do we as tax payers borrow trillions of dollars to give to people around the world that hate the US and plan for our destruction?  The federal government is out of control with spending our hard earned money.  Hamas and Hezbollah are tied to Iran and are on the US DOS's terrorist list.  Any we help fund them while not supporting our frieds in Israel?

We need a total review of how the federal government spends and wastes our money overseas.  We must reduce the funds we give away to governments where our tax money is pocketed by foreign officials.  Our federal government is not accountable and the spending is out of control.

Let's spend our money on protecting our borders, helping the American citizens along the Gulf due to the oil spill, and reduce our taxes.  We do not need to support and fund our enemies.

knees There Obama take responsibility for his actions and his in-actions?  He likes to blame everyone, but himself for every issue that arises in the US or world.  Let's take a look at his record.

1.  He blames Bush and BP for the oil spill in the Gulf, even though he has been on it from Day 1 with slow federal response
2.  He blames Arizona's Governor for the illegal alien problem and tells her that she is wrong, when he has not read the bill
3.  He blames Bush for the national debt of $13 Trillion, even when $2 Trillion has been added since he was elected
4.  He blames Israel for defending its borders to ensure that weapons are not transported to Gaza
5.  He blames Bush for Iran proceeding with its nuclear weapons
6.  He blames the public for not wanting new health care reform when we know that it will add trillions to our national deficit
7.  He blames South Korea for the sinking of their ship from a North Korean bomb
8.  He blames Wall Street for our economic condition while driving policies that target businesses and limits growth
9.  He blames Bill Clinton for offering federal positions to individuals who they do not want to run for political office
10. He allows Eric Holder to run the Justice Department as a "Cowboy Socialist"
11. He blames Bush for not funding border security and building the fence
12. He bows to other world leaders and blames his height for his bending at the knees

There are many other examples of Obama not being a real President and leader.  His community organizer training has not prepared him for this job and he is now worst than Jimmy Carter.  There is corruption and many examples of Chicago politics while there is no transparency or accountability.  When will the media do their job and go after Obama like they did Bush?  Right....

Can the nation survive Obama for 2 and 1/2 more years?  Weprayy to God that he is stopped along with his Democrat Congress.  We must get voters out to change the direction of this socialist.  We need real hope for America, not what Obama has brought us.